403 results for 'cat:"Immigration"'.
[Consolidated.] J. Smith finds a lower court properly dismissed a defendant's motion to remain in the U.S. The defendant, who was arrested and convicted for possession of illegal drugs, argued that he was entitled to a deferral of removal under the Convention Against Torture Act, and then a bid for reconsideration after the board of immigration appeals denied his application for CAT. However, the government sufficiently showed in court that he was not entitled to relief based on lack of evidence that he would be tortured by a drug cartel and high ranking, corrupt officials in Mexico. Affirmed.
Court: 8th Circuit, Judge: Smith, Filed On: May 3, 2024, Case #: 22-2474, Categories: Drug Offender, Evidence, immigration
J. Smith denies the Mexican citizens' petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' denial of their application for asylum and relief under the Convention Against Torture. Petitioners entered the U.S. without documentation and say that the Mexican Navy will persecute and torture them in order to stop the mother's campaign to hold the military responsible for her son's disappearance. Though the immigrants are not required to establish past persecution in order to support the possibility of future persecution, that the mother had publicly spoken out against the Navy via news media repeatedly for months without suffering harm does not support the claims of persecution.
Court: 5th Circuit, Judge: Smith , Filed On: May 1, 2024, Case #: 23-60089, Categories: Evidence, immigration, International Law
J. Grant finds that the district court properly denied the father's petition seeking the return of his son under the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction and the International Child Abduction Remedies Act. The mother took the child from Venezuela without the father's knowledge or permission and moved to Florida. The district court correctly found that the Convention did not require the child's return because the father filed the petition more than a year after the child was removed from Venezuela and the child is settled in his new environment. Although the outcome of the mother's asylum petition has not yet been decided, that fact does not outweigh the evidence of the child's connections to his new community. Affirmed.
Court: 11th Circuit, Judge: Grant, Filed On: May 1, 2024, Case #: 23-12566, Categories: immigration
J. Peterson grants the U.S. government officials' motion to dismiss the husband and wife's lawsuit asking the court to compel the officials to finish adjudicating a family-based visa petition conditionally approved in 2022 for the wife, who is a citizen of Uganda. Given controlling case law, the husband and wife have not proven their 18-month wait for a consular interview is unreasonable, in part due to evidence in the record of backlogs caused by the Covid-19 pandemic.
Court: USDC Western District of Wisconsin, Judge: Peterson, Filed On: May 1, 2024, Case #: 3:23cv520, NOS: Other Immigration Actions - Immigration, Categories: Administrative Law, immigration, Covid-19
Want access to unlimited case records and advanced research tools? Create your free CasePortal account now. No credit card required to register.
Try CasePortal for Free
J. Moore grants the El Salvadoran immigrant's petition for review of his removal order, ruling the immigration panel erroneously considered him statutorily ineligible for cancellation of removal as a result of his Tennessee domestic violence conviction. That crime does not necessarily involve the use of physical force and, therefore, is not a crime of violence.
Court: 6th Circuit, Judge: Moore, Filed On: April 30, 2024, Case #: 23-3004, Categories: Civil Procedure, immigration
Per curiam, the circuit denies the Mexican citizen's petition for review of the denial of withholding of removal. Though the immigrant has established membership in the LGBTQ social group as a transgender woman and, therefore, having a greater chance of being assaulted, tortured, or murdered in Mexico, the potential incidents cited do not rise to the level necessary to support withholding of removal. Though it may be true the police target transgender women, reversal under the substantial evidence standard is improper unless evidence not only supports reversal but compels it.
Court: 5th Circuit, Judge: Per curiam, Filed On: April 29, 2024, Case #: 23-60225, Categories: immigration, Lgbtq
J. Ezra partially grants Texas’ motion to dismiss after the federal government sued the state and Governor Greg Abbott over its “buoy barrier” in the Rio Grande, which was installed in the national water boundary “without any federal authorization.” While the United States can proceed with claims under the federal Rivers and Harbors Act, it cannot pursue claims based on the 1848 Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo because the treaty is “not self-executing” and does not “provide any specific standard or rule of decision for a domestic court to follow.” Nonetheless, while Texas has asserted that it has “territorial rights” to protect itself from a migrant “invasion,” “the Founding Fathers conceptualized invasions as a part of war” and not due to migration.
Court: USDC Western District of Texas , Judge: Ezra, Filed On: April 26, 2024, Case #: 1:23cv853, NOS: Environmental Matters - Other Suits, Categories: Environment, Government, immigration
J. Kirsch dismisses the South African immigrant's appeal of the cancellation of his removal based on having overstayed his visa. The immigrant was twice arrested on domestic violence charges, and, although the charges were dismissed, the board reasonably found that his criminal history made him ineligible to cancel his removal proceedings.
Court: 7th Circuit, Judge: Kirsch, Filed On: April 25, 2024, Case #: 23-2208, Categories: immigration
J. Lewis finds a lower court properly dismissed a Bangladesh national's motion to remain in the U.K. The Bangladesh national argued that he is entitled to live in the U.K. based on his tier one highly skilled person. However, the Home Department sufficiently showed in court that he invested in a bogus company that made fraudulent transactions. Affirmed.
Court: Her Majesty's Court of Appeal, Judge: Lewis, Filed On: April 25, 2024, Case #: CA-2023-1822, Categories: immigration
J. Sales finds a lower court improperly dismissed the Secretary of State for the Home Department's order to deport a native of Belarus. The native of Belarus argued that he is entitled to remain in the U.K. in order to shed his limbo status. However, the Home Department sufficiently showed in court that he was convicted for carrying a false identity document, which landed him in prison for 10 months. Affirmed.
Court: Supreme Court of the United Kingdom, Judge: Sales, Filed On: April 24, 2024, Case #: 2024UKSC13, Categories: Civil Rights, Fraud, immigration
J. Elrod denies the Honduran native's petition for review of the board's denial of her applications for asylum. The mother and her three children entered the U.S. without documentation and conceded removability before applying for asylum. The mother claims Honduran gangs used an empty lot behind her home to torture, kill and bury victims, subjecting her family to sounds of screaming and the smell of rotting corpses. She still fails to show past persecution or a well-founded fear of persecution. She also fails to present evidence supporting her claim a board member demonstrated partiality by not requiring the government to file a brief.
Court: 5th Circuit, Judge: Elrod , Filed On: April 19, 2024, Case #: 22-60479, Categories: immigration, International Law, Judiciary
J. Holcomb denies the government's motion to dismiss a naturalized citizen's allegations of violation of the Fifth Amendment after he filed an I-130 petition on behalf of his stepson, which the government revoked, because the citizen did not establish “that the beneficiary legally changed his name." The court possesses subject matter jurisdiction. It is premature for the court to rule on whether the statute is unconstitutionally vague as applied to this action. The citizen has sufficiently stated an equal protection claim in asserting that Yemeni-Americans and their family members are subjected to a heightened evidentiary burden that is not applied to other citizens. The citizen has sufficiently stated a procedural due process claim by alleging that Immigration Services did not include his marriage certificate in the appeal sent to the Board of Immigration Appeals.
Court: USDC Central District of California, Judge: Holcomb, Filed On: April 18, 2024, Case #: 8:23cv624, NOS: Other Immigration Actions - Immigration, Categories: immigration
J. Andrews finds a lower court improperly dismissed a national of Somalia's motion to remain in the U.K. The Secretary of State for the Immigration and Asylum Chamber argued that the Somalian native lacks immigration credentials, which left him stranded in Ethiopia as he fought to recover from tuberculosis. However, he presented sufficient evidence in court that his mother and sponsor, who lives in the U.K., suffers from extreme illness, and that he is entitled to relief based his status of returning resident. Reversed.
Court: Her Majesty's Court of Appeal, Judge: Andrews , Filed On: April 17, 2024, Case #: CA-2023-482, Categories: immigration
Per curiam, the circuit finds the district court properly rendered judgment against a donut shop. The Cambodian immigrant's employment was allegedly in violation of the Trafficking Victims Protection Act, involving forced labor. Sufficient evidence shows the immigrant worked long hours for very low pay over a period of years, while being threatened with deportation. Sanctions were properly imposed on the immigrant's counsel for discovery violations and for filing fraudulent abstracts of judgment. Affirmed.
Court: 5th Circuit, Judge: Per curiam, Filed On: April 17, 2024, Case #: 22-40383, Categories: immigration, Sanctions, Labor
J. Rambin reverses a trial court order denying a male noncitizen’s request to dismiss a criminal misdemeanor charge against him, pursuant to the governor’s order to jail migrants for illegally crossing the Texas-Mexico border. Citing similar evidence in precedent cases, the non-citizen met his burden of showing the governor’s order has the discriminatory effect and purpose of selective prosecution based on gender discrimination. Reversed.
Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, Judge: Van Cleef, Filed On: April 16, 2024, Case #: 06-24-40-CR, Categories: Constitution, immigration, Trespass
J. Laing finds a lower court properly dismissed a native of Pakistan's motion to remain in the U.K. The native of Pakistan argued that she is entitled to remain in the U.K. However, the home department sufficiently showed in court that she engaged in a "sophisticated and organized series of frauds" over a ten year period, which included money laundering and collecting donations for a bogus "spiritual leadership" group, which helped her amass 54 residential properties. Affirmed.
Court: Her Majesty's Court of Appeal, Judge: Laing, Filed On: April 16, 2024, Case #: CA-2023-488, Categories: Fraud, Government, immigration
J. Stevens reverses and remands a trial court's order denying a non-citizen's claim of selective prosecution under the Texas Equal Rights Amendment. The defendant was arrested for criminal trespass on a railroad, a misdemeanor, pursuant to Governor Greg Abbott’s disaster proclamation in 34 counties to prevent the “ongoing surge” of illegal migrants from Mexico. The court of appeals is constrained to rule under another district's precedent, which found the state failed to show its prosecution of male, but not female, immigrants served a governmental interest in border protection. Reversed.
Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, Judge: Stevens, Filed On: April 16, 2024, Case #: 06-24-39-CR, Categories: Constitution, immigration, Trespass
J. Graber dismisses in part an immigrant's appeal from the 41-month prison sentence imposed following his guilty plea for attempted reentry by a removed noncitizen. The immigrant challenged the validity of his waiver of a grand jury indictment, but he waived the right to appeal that issue by pleading guilty unconditionally. The lower court correctly decided all other issues stemming from the matter. Affirmed in part.
Court: 9th Circuit, Judge: Graber, Filed On: April 12, 2024, Case #: 23-705, Categories: immigration
J. Papillion denies a request by the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction a Chinese citizen's claims concerning the delay in adjudication of her request for asylum. She alleges the agency has failed to comply with a non-discretionary requirement of federal agencies that requires adjudication of asylum applications “within a reasonable time.” The provision means jurisdiction exists as a federal question under a statute governing the administration of federal agencies.
Court: USDC Eastern District of Louisiana , Judge: Papillion, Filed On: April 12, 2024, Case #: 2:23cv2, NOS: Other Statutory Actions - Other Suits, Categories: immigration, Agency, Jurisdiction
J. Moore grants an Iraq citizen’s petition for review of denial of his motion to reopen from the board of immigration appeals based on changes in Iraq. The board erred when denying the motion because of the evidence submitted with his prior motions were the same each time. The court vacates the board’s decision and remands it back for further proceedings. Reversed.
Court: 6th Circuit, Judge: Moore, Filed On: April 11, 2024, Case #: 22-3743, Categories: Civil Rights, immigration, Due Process
[Consolidated]. J. Loken finds a lower court properly removed a Nigerian citizen back to Nigeria for defrauding insurance companies by setting up bogus car crashes in order to collect insurance payouts. The citizen of Nigeria, who pleaded guilty to mail fraud, argued that he was entitled to remain in the U.S. based on a letter submitted to the court by an attorney, even though the letter was supposed to be written by an actual law firm. However, the government sufficiently showed in court that he is removable based on his breach of the plea agreement. Affirmed.
Court: 8th Circuit, Judge: Loken, Filed On: April 10, 2024, Case #: 22-3235, Categories: Evidence, Fraud, immigration
J. Ramirez vacates the district court's denial of a motion for a preliminary injunction filed by Indian nationals who challenge the Secretary of State's distribution of visas. Because visa demand was high, the nationals' applications were held in abeyance until visa numbers were available - a delay they challenge. However, U.S. code governing discretionary relief prevents federal courts from hearing a challenge to the department's hold policies, as the actions are left to the discretion of the Attorney General. Vacated.
Court: 5th Circuit, Judge: Ramirez , Filed On: April 9, 2024, Case #: 23-40398, Categories: Government, immigration, Agency
[Modified.] J. Franson modifies the wording of a previously published opinion and denies a rehearing with no change in judgment. The trial court properly denied defendant's claim that he is entitled to sentencing relief based on his misunderstanding of potential immigration consequences of his conviction for assault with a firearm. The evidence supports his claim that he did not understand the potential immigration consequences when convicted, but he is ineligible for relief because no evidence shows he lacked an understanding years later when he was convicted for a DUI or when probation revocation proceedings were held. However, he may pursue a new motion based on arguments that his initial failure to understand potential immigration consequences was prejudicial. Vacated in part.
Court: California Courts Of Appeal, Judge: Franson, Filed On: April 8, 2024, Case #: F084751, Categories: Criminal Procedure, immigration, Assault
J. Harris finds the lower court properly denied the group of immigrant's motion to dismiss. The six non-citizens indicted for illegally reentering the U.S. following their prior removal moved to dismiss their indictments on the ground that the relevant provision is unconstitutional because it was enacted with a racially discriminatory purpose. The applicable provision includes the national-origin quota system, which initially gave preference to individuals from certain European countries. The revised provision eliminates racial discrimination by adjusting its formulas and adding preferences for family reunification and non-citizens with specified skills. It also sought to ensure that the new immigration system would be free of racial discrimination, in part by eliminating bars to naturalization based on race. Affirmed.
Court: 4th Circuit, Judge: Harris, Filed On: April 4, 2024, Case #: 22-4072, Categories: immigration
J. Floyd finds the Fourth Circuit lacks jurisdiction over the immigration appeal. The Yemen native was a member of the Yemeni Socialist Party, actively fought in Yemen’s civil war in 1994 where he was imprisoned. The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services denied his application for asylum status on terrorism grounds. Congress provides that court have no jurisdiction over decisions the authority for which is specified to be in the discretion of the Attorney General.
Court: 4th Circuit, Judge: Floyd, Filed On: April 3, 2024, Case #: 21-2010, Categories: immigration, Agency, Jurisdiction